Transesophageal Electrophysiology

Comparative study of auricular stimulation by transesophageal and endocavitary approach for evaluating sinus and atrioventricular node function.

Cebron JP, Brugada J, Gallay P, Puech P. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1987 Feb;80(2):170-5. The purpose of this study was to find out whether non-invasive transoesophageal pacing could effectively replace right intra-atrial pacing for the indirect evaluation of sinus node and atrioventricular (AV) node function. In a population of 17 patients the corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRT), the atrio-sinu-atrial conduction time (ASACT) and Wenckebach's point (W) were calculated by intracavitary pacing, then by transoesophageal pacing. There was no significant difference between the two methods in pre-pacing sinus cycle. With right intra-atrial pacing, mean CSRT value was 365 +/- 54 ms (with 5 values greater than 520 ms), mean ASACT value was 229 +/- 29 ms (with 8 values greater than 220 ms), and W occurred at a mean cycle length of 425 +/- 29 ms. With transoesophageal pacing, mean CSRT value was 406 +/- 87 ms (with 5 values greater than 520 ms), mean ASACT value was 222 +/- 17 ms (with 8 values greater than 220 ms), and W occurred at a mean cycle length of 408 +/- 26 ms. The two methods correlated very closely for CSRT and W (r = 0.97) and relatively well for ASACT (r = 0.84). The number of CSRT and ASACT values regarded as prolonged was the same with the two methods; 4% of recorded (i.e. maximal) CSRT values occurred with the same length of pacing cycle. There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the calculation of CSRT and ASACT, but W occurred at a slightly shorter cycle (p less than 0.05) with transoesophageal pacing. Thus, transoesophageal pacing is a non-invasive, easy to perform method for indirect exploration of sinus node and AV node function in patients who do not require subnodal conduction studies.

Scroll to Top